AWS compute spend negotiation, top to bottom.
EC2 right-sizing, Graviton migration cost modeling, Spot Fleet strategy, auto-scaling cost impact analysis, and container orchestration optimization across EKS, ECS, and Fargate. We shrink the floor before negotiating the rate.
Right-sizing comes before
commitment, not after.
The most expensive mistake in AWS commitment planning is buying Savings Plans against an inflated baseline. If your fleet is over-provisioned by 25%, a three-year Compute Savings Plan locks in that over-provisioning for 36 months. Right-sizing must come first — and it has to be more than a CloudWatch screenshot.
We work the entire compute stack: instance-family selection, generation upgrades, Graviton migration paths, Spot capacity strategy, container density, and the auto-scaling policies that determine how your fleet behaves under load. Each lever changes the floor that commitments need to cover, and each has second-order effects on architecture and operations.
Done in the right order — right-size, then re-architect, then commit — compute spend typically falls 30–45% versus its uncorrected baseline before any negotiation begins. The commitment work then layers on additional discount against a cleaner baseline.
Every lever in the compute stack.
Right-size, re-architect, then commit.
Compute audit
90-day usage analysis across every account. Output: right-sizing recommendations, Graviton portability scoring, Spot eligibility map, and container utilization report.
Architecture co-design
Work with your engineering teams to sequence the highest-impact changes: generation refresh, Graviton waves, Spot adoption, and container density.
Commitment alignment
Re-baseline the compute floor and align Savings Plans and EDP commitments to the post-optimization baseline rather than the inflated starting point.
What clients actually save.
Often combined with compute work.
Your compute baseline
is inflated.
38% average reduction across 500+ engagements. We audit your fleet in two weeks.