Negotiating a New AWS Agreement
Enterprises with over $1M in annual AWS spend must approach a new AWS contract with a strategic, data-driven negotiation plan. Success lies in thorough preparation, understanding cloud usage patterns and future needs, and leveraging independent expertise to secure better terms.
By treating an AWS agreement like a major strategic sourcing project, CIOs and IT leaders can avoid common pitfalls (such as overcommitment and cost surprises) and achieve a flexible deal that balances cost savings with business agility.
The following playbook provides a Gartner-style advisory on effectively negotiating a new AWS contract, from identifying key challenges to executing a step-by-step negotiation strategy.
In summary, to successfully negotiate a new AWS agreement, large enterprises should:
- Prepare extensively before engaging AWS: Audit current cloud usage, optimize costs, and forecast 3-5 year demand to define a realistic commitment level.
- Leverage competition and expertise: Use independent cloud cost experts and benchmark data to gain leverage and signal a willingness to consider multi-cloud alternatives for better bargaining power.
- Negotiate critical terms for flexibility: Focus on securing higher discounts, favorable term lengths with “ramp-up” commitments, protections against unpredictable costs (eg. support fees, data egress), and the ability to adjust if business needs change. Engaging an independent advisor (e.g. Redress Compliance or similar cloud consultancy) can help validate AWS’s offers and ensure the contract aligns with your interests, not just AWS’s.
Problem Overview
Many enterprises entering new AWS agreements face significant pain points and risks that can undermine cost predictability and business alignment. Cloud spend often grows unpredictably, and without careful planning, companies may struggle to predict costs or enforce budget discipline.
AWS’s contractual framework – including Enterprise Discount Programs (EDPs) – typically requires committing to spend levels or prepayments that might not perfectly match actual usage, leading to commitment misalignment.
If an organization overestimates growth and overcommits, it pays for capacity it doesn’t use; if it underestimates and undercommits, it can incur unplanned on-demand charges at higher rates. This balancing act makes crafting the “right” commitment challenging.
Moreover, AWS often maintains control over commercial terms in standard agreements. AWS’s standard customer agreement and Private Pricing terms are vendor-centric, leaving limited room to negotiate provisions like termination rights, service-level guarantees, or price protections.
Enterprises may find that critical terms (e.g., annual spend commitments, support fees, auto-renewals) heavily favor AWS unless actively negotiated. The lack of transparency into AWS’s discount models and the one-off nature of custom deals further exacerbate the problem – customers have little insight into whether they are getting a fair deal.
In summary, without a deliberate strategy, companies risk signing AWS contracts that lock in high costs, inflexible terms, and potential cost overruns while leaving value on the table.
Key Challenges
When negotiating a new AWS contract, CIOs and sourcing teams should be aware of several key challenges that commonly arise:
- Lack of transparency in pricing and discount tiers: AWS does not publicly disclose specific discount tiers or “street prices” for large deals. Each Enterprise Discount Program is bespoke, which makes it hard for customers to know what discount percentage they could get. This opacity means enterprises must negotiate somewhat blindly – AWS might offer a certain discount. Still, without competitive benchmarks or expert insight, it isn’t easy to gauge if that’s the best. AWS’s pricing complexity (hundreds of services, varying usage tiers) further clouds the picture, and hidden costs (like data transfer fees) can catch buyers off guard. Customers often only discover better discounts (that peers received) after the fact, underscoring the importance of independent benchmarks.
- Misaligned commitments in Enterprise Discount Programs (EDPs): The AWS EDP (now often called a Private Pricing Agreement) requires committing to a large annual or multi-year spend. A common pitfall is committing to an inflexible spend level that doesn’t match actual business reality. If you overshoot the commitment, additional usage may not receive the same discount (or you could quickly exhaust pre-paid funds and revert to on-demand pricing). If you undershoot, you still owe the committed amount, effectively paying for cloud resources you didn’t use. Many enterprises have been scrambling to “use up” EDP dollars on low-priority workloads – or conversely, paying steep on-demand rates once they blow past a commitment mid-term. Misaligned or overly optimistic commitments lead to waste, unbudgeted expenses, and a cloud environment driven by contract terms rather than real needs.
- Difficulty forecasting cloud consumption over a 3-5 year term: Predicting cloud usage for the next few quarters is hard – predicting it for the next 3+ years is a major challenge. Business growth rates, product roadmaps, acquisitions/divestitures, or technology changes (e.g., adopting a new SaaS product or refactoring apps) can radically alter AWS consumption. This uncertainty makes it risky to commit to a fixed spend trajectory. Many organizations fear locking themselves into a contract that in year 2 or 3 proves too high (if growth slows and they overcommitted) or too low (if a new initiative spikes usage beyond expectations). In either case, the enterprise loses through wasted budget or escalating costs beyond the contract. The dynamic nature of cloud (where teams can spin up new environments or embrace new services rapidly) adds to the difficulty of forecasting. A long-term AWS deal can become misaligned with actual usage reality without flexible contract structures (like ramp-up clauses or re-negotiation checkpoints).
- Cost escalations from unexpected service growth: AWS bills can surge in specific areas not anticipated during negotiation. Two common culprits are data egress and support costs. Data transfer (especially data leaving AWS) can be very expensive, and usage patterns (e.g., customer analytics, multi-region architectures, or backups) might drive outbound data to levels far beyond initial estimates, resulting in hefty charges that often are not discounted under standard contracts. Similarly, AWS Enterprise Support fees scale with spend (typically 3-10% of your AWS charges); as your usage grows, support costs automatically rise, sometimes reaching six or seven figures. New workloads in trending domains like AI/ML can also inflate costs unexpectedly – for example, training machine learning models on GPU instances or large-scale analytics on AWS can burn through budget quickly. These growth areas might lack upfront discounts or have premium pricing, causing overall AWS spend to escalate even if core compute/storage costs were negotiated down. Enterprises must anticipate and negotiate on these “hidden” cost drivers; otherwise, they risk big overages in areas outside of any discount agreement.
- Limited negotiation leverage without competitive benchmarks: Going into an AWS negotiation without data points or alternatives is like entering a duel blindfolded. AWS sales teams negotiate contracts daily and have extensive pricing data, while most enterprises only renegotiate every few years and have insight into their own deals. Without independent benchmarks or external expert guidance, it’s difficult to challenge AWS’s initial offer or know how far you can push. Additionally, your leverage diminishes if AWS perceives that you are fully committed to AWS only (with no intention to consider Azure, Google Cloud, or hybrid options). Many enterprises lack meaningful leverage because they haven’t developed a backup plan or gathered market intelligence – AWS can sense when a customer has no viable alternative. The result is often accepting suboptimal terms. The challenge for negotiators is to create leverage by using industry pricing benchmarks, engaging third-party advisors who know cloud contract “norms,” and signaling that you have options (even if realistically moving off AWS is difficult). Without this, the negotiation can become one-sided in AWS’s favor.
Comparison of AWS Pricing Models
When structuring an AWS agreement, it’s important to understand the different purchasing models available and how each affects pricing and discounts.
The table below compares On-Demand pricing, Reserved Instances/Savings Plans, and the Enterprise Discount Program (EDP) in terms of cost dynamics and commitments:
Aspect | On-Demand (Pay-as-you-go) | Reserved Instances / Savings Plans (Prepaid Capacity) | Enterprise Discount Program (EDP) (Private Pricing Agreement) |
---|---|---|---|
Payment Commitment | None – pay only for what you use each month (no long-term commitment) | Commit to a specific amount of usage (e.g. certain VM instances or $/hour of compute) for 1-3 years, often with upfront or scheduled payments | Commit to a large spending amount (e.g. $1M+ per year) over a multi-year contract (typically 3+ years); usually billed monthly against the commitment |
Discount / Cost Savings | No inherent discount (pay full published AWS rates; only small built-in tier discounts on some services) | Significant discounts on the committed resources (e.g. up to ~30-72% off compute costs, depending on term length and payment type for RIs/Savings Plans) | Customized discount (e.g. ~5-15%+ off overall AWS spend) negotiated based on total commitment. Larger and longer commitments yield higher % discounts (tiered rates). May also include service-specific discounted pricing or credits as negotiated. |
Coverage & Scope | All AWS services on a pay-as-you-go basis (highest flexibility to use any service as needed) | Applies only to specific services or usage categories: e.g. an EC2 Reserved Instance covers a particular instance family/region, or a Savings Plan covers certain compute usage. Does not automatically discount other services outside the reservation scope. | Typically applies broadly across most AWS services used by the enterprise (organization-wide). Some exclusions may apply (Marketplace spend, third-party services, etc., often not discounted but sometimes counted toward commitment). Provides organization-wide rate protection up to the committed spend. |
Flexibility & Risk | Maximum flexibility: scale usage up or down without obligations. Risk: Costs can rapidly increase with usage growth; budgeting is unpredictable, and no volume discounts means potentially paying more at scale. | Moderate flexibility: lower costs for steady workloads, but locked into specific usage. You can’t easily scale down reserved capacity without potential waste (though some RIs can be modified or sold on a marketplace). Risk: overcommitting capacity leads to paying for unused resources; under-committing means you’ll still pay on-demand rates for excess usage. Requires careful capacity planning. | Lower flexibility (contractual lock-in): you must meet spend commitments over years. Provides predictability in budgeting and discounts, but commitment risk is high – if you undershoot, you pay for unused commit (or pay a penalty); if you dramatically overshoot, additional spend may get no discount until you renegotiate. Switching providers or reducing spend is constrained during the term (vendor lock-in). However, an EDP offers negotiation of custom terms (e.g. ability to ramp up or down annually) to introduce some flexibility if negotiated well. |
Key takeaway: On-demand offers agility but at the highest unit cost; Reserved Instances/Savings Plans trade some flexibility for significant savings on specific predictable workloads; and EDPs provide the largest overall discounts across all usage but require long-term commitments and savvy negotiation to avoid financial pitfalls.
Enterprises often use a mix – optimizing steady-state usage with RIs/SPs, and leveraging EDP discounts for broad spend coverage – to balance cost and flexibility.
Strategic Playbook for AWS Contract Negotiation
Negotiating a new AWS agreement is a complex endeavor that requires a structured approach.
Below is a step-by-step strategic playbook to guide CIOs and sourcing teams through the process, ensuring you maximize value and minimize risk in your AWS contract:
- Build a negotiation strategy and team before engaging AWS. Treat the AWS contract negotiation as a major project – start preparations 6-12 months before any renewal or new contract signing. Assemble a cross-functional team including IT architects, FinOps/cloud cost managers, procurement, and finance stakeholders. Define clear objectives for the negotiation: for example, a target percentage cost reduction, improved contract terms (flexibility, SLAs, etc.), or support for upcoming initiatives. Align internal leadership early on what success looks like (e.g., CFO wants cost savings, CTO wants freedom to adopt new AWS services, etc.). This internal consensus will shape your strategy. Develop a negotiation plan that outlines roles, timeline, and “walk-away” positions. Importantly, plan your messaging to AWS: decide what information about your growth or multi-cloud plans to share (or hold back) to strengthen your position. By having a solid strategy and united team before AWS even sends a proposal, you control the narrative rather than reacting to AWS’s sales approach.
- Collect and analyze data on your AWS usage and requirements. Data is your best ally in negotiation. Begin with a comprehensive audit of current AWS usage and spend. Identify where your dollars are going: which services drive the most cost, what usage trends are emerging, and where there is waste or idle resources. Optimize your environment before locking in a new contract – for example, right-size overprovisioned resources, eliminate unused instances, and implement cost-saving measures like autoscaling or existing Savings Plans. A leaner baseline spend puts you in a stronger bargaining position (AWS will have less “fat” to use as a baseline, and you won’t commit to unnecessary spending). Next, forecast your future needs as accurately as possible. Work with product teams and business units to project growth scenarios for the next 3-5 years: upcoming projects, expected user growth, geographic expansion, etc. Model different scenarios (conservative vs. optimistic) to understand possible cloud spend outcomes. Pay special attention to any planned new use cases (e.g., machine learning, IoT, big data) that could drastically increase usage of certain services (GPU instances, high volumes of data transfer, etc.). Also, note any areas where spending might decrease (e.g., if you plan to retire legacy systems or move some workload off AWS). By quantifying your needs, you can determine a realistic commitment level and identify which services to focus on for discounts. This preparation enables you to approach AWS with hard numbers and a clear story (“Our analysis shows we’ll grow ~50% in storage and 30% in compute over 3 years, but we are aggressively optimizing X and Y. We’re prepared to commit $N over 3 years in exchange for Z% discount.”). It also helps prevent AWS from dictating the commitment based on their own (often overly optimistic) projections of your growth.
- Identify and prioritize the key terms to negotiate. An AWS contract is more than just a discount percentage – several critical terms will determine the value and flexibility of your deal. Prepare a list of contractual terms you must negotiate and rank them by importance. Key items include:
- Discount levels and structure: Aim for the highest possible percentage off AWS list prices. Insist on clarity about how the discount is applied (is it a flat rate across all usage, tiered by spending level, or Specific to certain services?). Push for tiered discounts that improve if your spend grows, so you automatically get better rates if you exceed certain spend thresholds. Consider negotiating service-specific discounts for services that dominate your costs (e.g., if 40% of your spend is on EC2 or S3, negotiate extra price breaks for those). Every extra point of discount translates to significant dollars saved at $1M+ scale.
- Commitment amount and term length: Negotiate a commitment that is ambitious enough to secure a strong discount but not so high that it becomes unattainable. It’s often wise to commit less than your true “worst-case” forecast to leave room for unforeseen shortfalls. Likewise, choose an appropriate term length: AWS will push for longer (3-5 years) for stability and higher discounts, but you should weigh the flexibility of a shorter term. If you agree to a 5-year term, ensure there are provisions to adjust if business conditions change (for example, a mid-term checkpoint or the ability to increase/decrease commitment by a certain percentage with notice). Alternatively, a 3-year term with a “ramp-up” structure can be effective: commit to a lower spend in Year 1 with increases in Years 2 and 3 as your usage grows. Ramp clauses align costs with actual growth and prevent overpaying in the early period. Ensure the contract defines how under- or over-consumption is handled: Can unused committed funds roll over to the next year? Do you pay list price for any usage beyond the commit, or will AWS extend the discount to overage (perhaps up to a limit)? Clarity here can prevent nasty surprises if you grow faster than expected.
- Flexibility clauses (uncommitted spend and adjustments): Where possible, negotiate for flexibility. This might include a cushion or grace period if you under-consume (e.g., allowing extra time or rolling credits into the next period rather than immediate forfeiture). For over-consumption, include a clause that you can amend the contract to increase commitments (and retain discounts) if you blow past your commitment early; otherwise, you’re stuck paying on-demand rates until a new deal is signed. If your organization is pursuing a multi-cloud or hybrid strategy, ensure the AWS agreement does not force all workloads to stay on AWS; preserve the right to diversify vendors if needed (no exclusivity clause beyond the commit). In short, bake as much flexibility as possible around the rigid spending commitment.
- Support fees and service levels: Enterprise Support is a significant add-on cost (AWS typically charges a percentage of your spend, e.g., 3-10%). Negotiate the support terms alongside the main contract. For large customers, AWS may agree to cap support fees or provide additional support value (like dedicated Technical Account Managers, training credits, etc.) as part of the deal. Ensure you’re not automatically paying more support fees as you spend more – for example, seek a flat fee or discounted support rate if your cloud spend will grow. Also clarify service-level expectations: while AWS’s standard SLAs are mostly non-negotiable, you can negotiate credits or remedies beyond the standard SLA in certain cases, especially for critical workloads. At a minimum, ensure the contract explicitly includes your enrollment in Enterprise Support. Given your investment, consider asking for executive-level support commitment (e.g., regular architecture reviews, access to AWS solution architects for optimization).
- Renewal and exit terms: Plan for the end of this contract before you sign it. Negotiate no automatic renewal (or at least no automatic uplift in commitment) without renegotiation – you want the opportunity to revisit terms in light of market changes. If possible, include a clause that you can extend the contract term at the same rates if you need more time to negotiate a new deal (preventing a lapse where you’d pay on demand in the interim). Also, clarify any early termination or adjustment rights: while AWS will not make it easy to reduce commitments, understand any penalties or conditions if you had to terminate for cause or if your company is acquired/divested (can the commitment be reassigned or adjusted?). A clean exit strategy or renewal plan will motivate AWS to earn your business again, rather than assuming you’re locked in forever.
- Engage independent experts and gather competitive benchmarks. One of the most powerful tools in your arsenal is external market insight. Consider engaging an independent cloud cost advisory firm or licensing negotiator (such as Redress Compliance, Gartner consulting, or specialist cloud negotiation consultancies). These experts have experience with many AWS contracts and can provide invaluable benchmarks: what discount percentage other companies of your size typically achieve, which contract clauses are negotiable, and where AWS tends to be flexible or firm. They can perform a pricing benchmark analysis of AWS’s proposal to identify if there’s room for improvement. Importantly, independent experts act in your interest (unlike AWS representatives, who ultimately answer to AWS’s sales goals). They can also help you calculate a realistic commit number and identify optimizations or alternatives AWS might not volunteer. In addition to third-party experts, do some competitive sourcing: engage with Azure and Google Cloud sales teams in parallel, if only to get comparative quotes or incentive offers. Even if you don’t plan an immediate multi-cloud move, having a ballpark figure of “Azure would give us X% off for a similar commit” arms you with leverage. Communicate (strategically) to AWS that you are exploring all options – for instance, mention that your board or CIO is evaluating a diversified cloud strategy, or that you’ve received attractive migration funding offers from competitors. This doesn’t mean you’ll switch, but it dramatically strengthens your negotiating position with AWS. AWS is much more likely to sharpen its pencil if it knows a rival cloud provider is trying to poach a $ 1 M+ account. Use independent expert findings and competitor quotes as a reality check against AWS’s offers. Don’t hesitate to push back by saying, “We have data that suggests this discount is below market for our commitment level,” and back it up. Overall, by engaging outside help and considering alternative suppliers, you break out of the information silo and avoid negotiating on AWS’s terms alone.
- Enter negotiations with a leverage-driven approach and a clear ask. When it’s time to formally negotiate with AWS (often with an AWS account manager or sales team assigned to your account), come to the table extremely prepared. Open the dialogue by articulating your vision for the partnership. For example, “We’re looking at AWS as a long-term strategic platform for our growth, and we want a sustainable agreement that works for both sides.” Then lay out your data-backed case: present a concise summary of your usage forecasts, the value of your account to AWS, and your requirements (from the terms list you prioritized). It’s often effective to share that you have done your homework: mention that you’ve benchmarked industry deals and have alternative options. This signals to AWS that this is a serious, professional negotiation, not just a routine renewal where you’ll take whatever is offered. During negotiation discussions, manage the flow of information carefully. You might initially understate your growth projections to avoid AWS using very high future spend in their calculations (which could push them to demand a larger commitment).On the other hand, emphasize your value: highlight any business growth potential you bring (e.g. entering new markets, which will increase AWS usage), and any strategic partnerships – perhaps your company is a referenceable brand or is willing to co-develop a case study with AWS, which AWS often rewards with a bit more flexibility. Be cordial but firm: if AWS’s initial offer is insufficient on key points, explicitly ask for improvements (“We were expecting a larger discount given our spend – here is what we need to make this viable.”). Use timing to your advantage – AWS sales teams have quarterly and annual targets. If possible, initiate or accelerate negotiations in Q4 or AWS’s year-end, when reps are eager to close deals and may give extra concessions. Also, don’t negotiate in a vacuum of AWS’s team; escalate if needed. Engage senior account executives or corporate AWS negotiators for large deals, especially if initial conversations stall. Maintain a united front with your internal team – avoid mixed messages. If AWS tries the classic tactic of going around procurement to an executive with a soft pitch, ensure that executive is aligned with the negotiation stance. Every ask you make (whether a higher discount, a particular clause, etc.) should be backed by rationale – AWS will respond better if you justify requests in terms of mutual benefit or industry norm, rather than just “because we want it.” Finally, be willing to give and take: for example, you might agree to a longer commitment term or a larger upfront payment if AWS in return increases the discount and adds a flexible ramp. Negotiate a complete package that covers pricing, support, and terms together – sometimes AWS may concede more on one dimension if you give ground on another. The goal is to arrive at a contract structure where you feel confident you can meet the commit (with some cushion), get excellent pricing that passes the “benchmark” test, and have protections against major downside scenarios.
- Finalize the contract and plan for ongoing management. Once you and AWS agree in principle, it’s time to scrutinize the contract documents line by line. Review every clause carefully to ensure the written contract matches the negotiated verbal promises. Pay particular attention to the discount structure, any custom pricing, and any special terms (like carryover of unused commitment, grace periods, or added credits) are documented. Ensure that any ambiguous language is clarified – for instance, if the contract says “customer will achieve at least X% savings,” verify how that is calculated in practice. It’s wise to have your legal team and any external advisor review the AWS Enterprise Agreement or Private Pricing Addendum for risks such as liability limitations, non-negotiated boilerplate, etc., but focus on the financial and operational terms you fought for. Before signing, double-check that internal stakeholders are on board with the final deal (especially finance, since they will own the budget impact). After signing, the work isn’t over: operationalize the contract. Communicate the committed spend targets to your cloud governance or FinOps teams so they can monitor usage against the commitment. Set up AWS Cost Explorer or third-party tools to track monthly spending – you don’t want surprises where you’re off track. Implement governance to prevent teams from significantly overspending outside of the plan (which could exhaust your commitment too fast) or underspending (which leaves money on the table). You should also schedule regular business reviews with AWS (quarterly) to discuss usage, get support value, and ensure the partnership delivers expected value. If the contract included training credits, migration funding, or other value-adds, use them. Plan for renewal well ahead of time: at least a year before the contract ends, reassess your needs and the market again. This ensures you’re not caught off guard and can negotiate the next deal from a position of strength. In essence, treat the AWS agreement as a living framework – continuously manage it, and be ready to negotiate changes if needed (some large customers even renegotiate mid-term if their usage diverges greatly from the plan, to adjust commitments or obtain better pricing on new high-cost services). By finalizing and actively managing a carefully negotiated contract, you’ll maximize the benefits and avoid the common fate of “sign and forget” (only to later discover overruns or missed savings). The result is an AWS partnership that supports your enterprise’s technical and financial goals.
Recommendations Summary
For CIOs, CTOs, and sourcing leaders embarking on an AWS negotiation, here are the immediate next steps and best practices to execute:
- Perform a thorough cloud audit and cost optimization now: Before discussing numbers with AWS, get your house in order. Identify and eliminate waste (idle resources, oversized instances) to reduce your baseline spend. This ensures you negotiate based on a lean usage profile without committing to needless expenses. Document your findings and savings achieved – this demonstrates to AWS that you have discipline and alternatives, strengthening your case for better pricing.
- Define your requirements and walk-away limits: Clarify internally what you need from the AWS deal (e.g., 10% cost reduction, ability to ramp down if needed, inclusion of support). Also, decide on your limits – for example, the maximum commitment you’re willing to sign or the minimum discount percentage acceptable. Having these guardrails prevents being swayed by sales pressure. Align these points with your CFO, CIO, and procurement leads upfront.
- Leverage independent experts and benchmarking: Don’t negotiate in isolation. Engage a third-party cloud licensing or cost optimization expert early in the process to provide an outside perspective. Firms like Redress Compliance or cloud spend consultants can quickly benchmark your proposed deal against industry peers and flag improvement areas. Use their analysis to back your asks (e.g., “Our advisor indicates enterprises of our size often get an extra 2-3% discount – we’d like to discuss that”). This external validation adds credibility to your negotiation points and helps avoid leaving money on the table.
- Explore multi-cloud or renewal alternatives: Proactively seek quotes or proposals from other providers (Azure, GCP) or even consider extending existing arrangements short-term as a fallback. The goal is to have a Plan B. Even if you prefer AWS, showing AWS that a Plan B exists (and is financially attractive) is crucial leverage. Internally, articulate the value of AWS versus others in case you need to justify switching. This due diligence strengthens your negotiating hand and ensures you’re choosing AWS for the right reasons, not just inertia.
- Negotiate beyond just price: focus on flexibility and future-proofing. Make flexibility a top negotiation theme. Insist on terms like phased commitments (annual ramps), the ability to adjust for unforeseen changes, and clear remedies for under/over-utilization. Negotiate support costs down or capped, and secure any credits or investment funds AWS can provide (for example, AWS migration funding, service credits for POCs, training budgets, etc.). These extras can significantly increase the value of the deal. Remember that a slightly lower discount is not worth a rigid contract that could cost you more later – balance pure discount with contractual flexibility and protections.
- Maintain executive engagement and oversight: Given the strategic importance of a $ 1 M+ per year cloud contract, keep executive leadership involved. Use your CIO/CTO to engage AWS executives if needed – a well-timed executive-to-executive conversation can break negotiation logjams and signal to AWS how important certain terms are to you. Internally, regular updates to the CIO/CFO on negotiation progress ensure backing for tough calls (like walking away if terms aren’t acceptable). And if talks stall or AWS isn’t budging, be prepared to escalate or pause negotiations rather than accept a bad deal. Demonstrating willingness to delay or walk away is often the strongest negotiating move – it forces AWS to reconsider and often come back with a more reasonable offer.
By following these steps, enterprises will be well-positioned to secure a new AWS agreement that delivers significant cost savings, aligns with business needs, and avoids the common traps of long-term cloud commitments. The result should be a partnership with AWS on your terms, enabling innovation and growth without compromising cost efficiency or flexibility.